Hi Stuart ,
I've serviced a Dragon but not to test the limits of its azimuth correction
system. I guess we're talking about severe azimuth changes, beyond what the
Nak was designed to deal with. Law enforcement people must have had to deal
with such recordings as court evidence and who knows what they may have
come up with. I've read of the JBR company and a modified microcassette
player they pitched to forensic people. I think it had a play head split
into something like 12 tracks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "ROBINSON Stuart" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Tascam 122n MK models
>I have never used a Dragon, but what I wonder when I think about is how
>long it takes to respond to azimuth changes? Does it for example respond
>fast enough to react to tapes that have country-laning issues? I have had
>cassettes where record issues have meant an almost constantly shifting
>azimuth and I wonder whether the system can correct for this or if it will
>end up in hysteresis always trying to seek the ideal point.
> Stuart Robinson,
> Audio-Visual Archival Technician,
> School of Scottish Studies Archives,
> The University of Edinburgh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tim Gillett
> Sent: 07 May 2019 04:03
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Tascam 122n MK models
> Hi Corey,
> On a dual capstan deck, the reason it's better for azimuth stability is
> its uniform back tension. In a standard single capstan deck, back tension
> from the supply reel tends to increase as the tape plays from start to
> Changing back tension can change azimuth. An interesting complication in
> our situation is that the deck which originally recorded the cassette we
> are now playing, may not have been dual capstan, meaning its recorded
> azimuth may well change from start to end of tape side.
> I was in a team digitising thousands of Oral History cassettes mostly
> recorded on simple single capstan cassette decks. We used Tascam Mk III
> playback machines which, like Naks have a constant back tension, but
> controlled electronically, not by dual capstan. Often the azimuth
> alignment would slowly drift from start to end of the tape side, seemingly
> always in the same direction. If we'd used Naks I suspect the result
> would have been similar.
> Ideally, such tapes would be played in a similar deck with similar back
> tension changes! Or on a model such as a Dragon, but I wonder how many of
> us have access to one of those?
> The other thing is that it's the constant back tension which *allows*
> removal or lifting of the pressure pad. This means that many otherwise
> fine dual capstan cassette decks would potentially benefit from the adding
> of a pressure pad lifter, as per the Naks. I've modded a few such dual
> capstan decks (Pioneer, Tandberg, Sony) with a custom made pressure pad
> lifter with good results. It's not always appreciated that the absence of
> the pressure pad greatly improves head life, which is one of the main
> reasons I like Naks myself.
> The Tascam 122 MkIII retains the pressure pad but it mostly works againt
> the record head, not the play, but has a role to play in maintaining the
> back tension across the play head downstream of it. The pressure pad on
> the record head causes quite a bad wear groove after not too long a time,
> but in even the worst wear cases I've never seen a play head - sitting
> right next to the record head- worn nearly as badly or unsalvageable.( The
> 122 head is a beautiful piece of engineering IMO, which unusually allows
> full adjustment of the record head independently of the play head. They're
> not locked together). In my view the 122 record/play head assembly should
> be replaced not when straight line playback performance suffers, but
> earlier when the record head becomes grooved due to the wear from the
> pressure pad..
> This is especially so when azimuth is routinely adjusted and the tape is
> forced to distort inside the "tramline track" of the worn record head as
> the head twists with azimuth adjustments. Of course this applies to any
> tape head in any machine.
> I noticed on a head from a later model Nak deck, relief slots were
> factory cut into the head faces. A nice feature, especially in a transfer
> situation where azimuth is regularly being adjusted.
> Tim Gillett
> Western Australia
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Corey Bailey" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2019 11:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Tascam 122n MK models
>> Hi John,
>> I prefer cassette decks with a dual capstan mechanism for playback. The
>> reason is that cassettes, particularly old ones, tend to skew and a dual
>> capstan deck will hold azimuth better throughout the length to the tape.
>> Some Nakamichi's also have the added feature of a pressure pad lifter. If
>> you are going to consider a NAK, be sure and buy one that was built post
>> 1982. Dual capstan decks are expensive, even used which, I think, is the
>> only way you will find one. The Tascam that you mention is current but a
>> good used dual capstan machine will out perform it, hands down.
>> My $0.02
>> Corey Bailey Audio Engineering
>> On 5/5/2019 7:19 AM, John Schroth wrote:
>>> Hoping to get some input from everyone.
>>> I'd like to add a Tascam 122 cassette deck to our inventory. I've been
>>> studying up on the different models, reading conflicting reports. Does
>>> anyone have recommendations on which of the models they prefer - the
>>> original 122, MK-II or MK-III?
>>> Thanks in advance for any input.
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> John Schroth
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland,
> with registration number SC005336.