LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  July 2019

ARSCLIST July 2019

Subject:

Re: Evaluating digital music archives

From:

"Paul T. Jackson" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 5 Jul 2019 18:08:08 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (62 lines)

a. Until the appeal is adjudicated, it would appear the 'first-sale' 
doctrine will no longer be available for digital content; whether books 
or recordings. If there is no longer a first sale doctrine, then there 
will be continued copyright in the work even though the law currently 
ends copyright after life of composer/author + xyears. That basically 
kills the need for copyright if content is digital.

b. Evaluation of a collection has to be done by an independent 
person/company, not the donor or the donee. I suspect it would be up to 
that person or company to decide how value is determined, and be able to 
support it. It wouldn't matter what the valuation is unless the IRS took 
the donor to court for fraudulent valuation deduction.
Thus: maybe the IRS will let us know if asked.

c. Much of what is online in Canada Virtual Gramophone, I was told by 
their agent, was free to use, and used in my uncles updated edition, 
Pioneers in Brass by Glenn D. Bridges (on CD-ROM.) And if the decision 
in a. above is correct, no first-sale nor thus, end of copyright, there 
would be no copyright in the work as it does not have any limit; 
therefore not part of copyright law. The Supreme court must decide if it 
wants to have perpetual copyright in everything digital or 
not....otherwise digital does not fall under copyright law...currently.

My opinion as former Law Librarian and follower of copyright since 
1960s...and reviewer of books on copyright for librarians. I really 
don't thing Capital or anyone can have it both ways.

A reminder, Google copied books, illegally, and the Supreme Court asked 
parties to settle. The authors did not settle, and so the judge decided 
(AFTER WRITING THAT IT WAS INFRINGEMENT,) declared it was FAIR USE; 
totally reversing himself. So I suspect the Supreme Court may decide for 
the publishers of the content as well...another reason to self-publish, 
and tell the corporations to go to hell.

Paul Jackson

On 7/5/2019 3:40 PM, David MacFadyen wrote:
> I have a three-part question, grounded in the complexities of assigning any *financial* worth to digital music collections.
>
> I’m a professor at UCLA, and have—over several decades—aggregated / edited a collection of Russian/East European tracks that numbers something like 2.5million in total, on all kinds of formats.
> I will donate this to a library or museum; I have no intention of selling anything.
>
> However...!
> When it comes to any possible financial evaluation or assessment that’s needed by a US library, at least three issues arise.
>
> 1. Does the recent Redigi case before the Supreme Court now mean that digital music archives may not be assigned any fiscal worth? https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2019/03/06/redigi-v-capitol-supreme-court/
>
> 2. Does anybody have experience in the evaluation of digital music prior to a donation? I’ve done plenty of research myself, but find lots of diverse, if not contradictory opinions online.
>
> 3. This is all from Russia, where piracy is so bad, a good deal of music is distributed for free. It helps to promote live shows. Nonetheless, even if we’re dealing with countless amateur and underground works that were never for sale, is there an inherent copyright complication in assigning them monetary value prior to the same donation?
>
> Russia and the US *should* observe the Berne Convention in identical ways. They, of course, do no such thing.
>
> Thanks!
> David (MacFadyen)
> Los Angeles
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager