Since there have been no postings for a couple of days now, it looks as
though this thread may have run it’s course.
I would like to thank those that posted & if anyone feels that they were
insulted or got their nose tweaked, I apologize.
I posted the question because I was surprised to see Kurt Nauck’s letter
to the membership in the newsletter.
I am a member of the ARSC DEI Committee. I didn’t mention it because;
1) I didn’t want to influence the conversation.
2) It wasn’t an official DEI function & I am not authorized to speak for
I joined the committee because I was surprised to learn that some felt
intimidated by certain members & others felt that certain members were
Tim Brooks made some interesting comments about the DEI committee’s
proposals in his post. I would suggest that the membership carefully
read those proposals and submit any ideas.
I have never met Kurt Nauck although I have participated in several of
his auctions (Nauctions) & intend to do so in the future. I don’t agree
with several points that he expressed in his letter to the membership.
However, if I do have the chance to meet him, I’m sure that we will
agree to disagree on some things.
Again, I would like to thank all of those that took the time & effort to
post their views.
Corey Bailey Audio Engineering