If I’m reading you correctly, this would mean this was mastered twice (simultaneously?), one at 78 and one at 33 on a 16” disc. Is that correct? My previous understanding was that everything after about 1940 was mastered on 33. What details are we missing on this?
For Best Results Use Victor Needles
Sent from my sluggish old iPhone, which explainz any bad typjng, bad spellimg, nonsensical word choices, delays and all other lapses.
> On Feb 19, 2021, at 4:29 PM, Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> T does not mean tape. It means Transfer, as in Transfer from 16-inch Western Electric Wide Range Vertical master disc. That also is what the W on Deccas stands for. Notice the missing W on the non transferred one?
> Mike Biel
> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Mickey Clark <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 3:25:41 PM
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: [ARSCLIST] Decca 1945 take numbers
> Hello-I have two copies of Decca 23547 – Siboney and Hasta Manana by bing Crosby with Xavier Cugat.
> Both sides have this aberration.
> Siboney on the Canadian issue – the MX is L3535B – dating from February 11, 1945
> Siboney on the American pressing is WL3535T6B
> I am just recording the one with the T and will compare the recordings once recorded.
> Does a firm date exist for when Decca started mastering on tape? I have seen this before, but on records that would have preceded the tape process - Mickey