LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  November 2021

ARSCLIST November 2021

Subject:

Re: 220V/50Hz 1/4" Open Reel Audio Playback Decks

From:

Tim Gillett <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 21 Nov 2021 20:55:23 +1100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (189 lines)

Hi Abhi,

I suspect your experience with the old acetates is common. When
brittle they can break easily but at least they break cleanly and 
can  be spliced back together again. The other issue which is common
is "cupping" on the oxide side. The top and bottom edges of the tape
are OK on the tape head but the centre section doesnt want to sit flat
so the sound is often muffled or weak. We can increase the tape
tension across the head but it risks breaking the tape.  Sometimes 
a temporary felt pressure pad, or small artist's brush, or even a
fingertip as you did can be used to press the centre section against
the head.

The problem you mentioned with the Lafayette acetates could be that
they were recorded on a Brush Soundmirror machine which only recorded
in the centre of the tape, leaving the top and bottom edges
unrecorded. A "cupped" acetate tape is the worst for this as it keeps
that most important part of the tape off the head. The reason the
Studer machine didnt play them well is probably that it was an NAB
half track machine which would have missed the centre part of the
tape. You're right that tracks 2 and 3 of a quarter track machine
would read it much better.   Actually a very good playback can be
obtained from a Soundmirror tape with a four track (four channel) 1/4"
head  using tracks 2 and 3. 

Best wishes,

Tim Gillett

Perth, Western Australia 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List"
<[log in to unmask]>
To:<[log in to unmask]>
Cc:
Sent:Sun, 21 Nov 2021 04:58:17 +0000
Subject:Re: [ARSCLIST] 220V/50Hz 1/4" Open Reel Audio Playback Decks

 Hi Richard,
 Wow! You have no idea what it means for a little guy like me to
contribute to this forum!
 First, just a very quick background. Although I was born and brought
up in the U.S., I spent all of my adult and professional life in India
(I am of Indian origin).
 I used to work in the recording studio of the Gramophone Company of
India. It used to be a wholly owned subsidiary of the GC of UK. Later
it became independent.
 GC of India has a tape archive with acetates starting from around
1955. They are almost entirely EMI tapes and are in excellent
condition. There’s no problem of brittleness and they play fine on
A80’s and 807’s.

 Now I work independently, usually with smaller archives or individual
collections. The name brand tapes that I get, e.g. Scotch 111 or
141, usually play fine on my A807. However, given the tropical
climate in India and the lack of maintenance of the tapes, warping is
a frequent problem.
 A few years ago, I inherited a dozen Lafayette brand tapes from my
uncle. The tapes were purchased in 1960 and recorded between 1961 to
1965. 
 These tapes are mostly brittle. Instead of A807, for most of these
tapes I had to use an Akai GX-4000D quarter track deck to play half
track recordings. Yes, I know I broke every rule in the book but I
couldn't think of any other way.
 Interestingly, for some of these tapes played on the Akai, I got a
better playback from tracks 2 and 3 compared to tracks 1 and 4. Of
course, I had to reverse them on my DAW.
 A few years ago I got an acetate similar to your Vermont tape. I
actually had to unwind several hundred feet of tape from the reel,
somehow thread the tape onto my Akai without any reels on either side,
and hold my index finger softly against the playback head while
playing.
 So, basically, the brittle acetates that I've encountered are due to
lack of maintenance or a cheap brand of tape.
 Coming back to Dave's original post, I was thinking to myself when I
first read it that it might be nearly impossible to find a machine
that can satisfy all of his conditions. But, then, I don't have any
experience with the ATR 100 or APR-5000.

 Best wishes,
 Abhi (short for Abhimonyu)
 ------------------------------------------

 Abhimonyu DebAudio Consultant and Digitization
Specialisthttps://www.linkedin.com/in/abhimonyudeb

 On Saturday, 20 November, 2021, 09:53:59 pm IST, Richard L. Hess
<[log in to unmask]> wrote: 

 Hi, Abbimonyu,

 This issue comes up in regard to many different machines. When I had
my 
 A80s, I used them for acetate tapes on a regular basis. I haven't
used 
 an A807 for a long time (as I preferred the A810 over the A807 for
many 
 reasons, and the A80 over the A810).

 In many respects, I think that the Sony APR-5000 is the gentlest of
the 
 list I posted. On the  other hand, I had no bad feedback from the
two 
 A807s (refurbished by Roger Ginsley) that were sold into an archiving

 project in Pakistan to use alongside their Tascam BR-20s (which I did

 not suggest for the current project because many versions were not
made 
 with power supply voltage selection).

 However, to answer Tim Gillette's rephrasing of the question, we
might 
 consider machines that start the capstan motor when going into play
so 
 you are not banging the stopped tape into the full-speed capstan. The

 Sony APR-5000 works that way and mutes the audio for a short period
of 
 time at startup.

 You weren't missing something and it is good that you posted. Perhaps
I 
 didn't provide enough weight to that criteria.

 I'd be interested in hearing more about the fragile acetate tapes
that 
 you encounter as I've been surprised at how well the Scotch 111 and 
 Audio Devices acetate tapes have held up. I've even been pleased with

 the paper tapes I've transferred as well. The only really fragile 
 acetate tape I've come across was one that sat behind a wood stove 
 through several Vermont winters. One face was welded together and
broke 
 on ever rotation of the supply reel.

 The one thing that seems to fail for me are splices onto paper
leader. I 
 have to remake all those splices after baking in many instances, but 
 that's with back-coated polyester tapes.

 Cheers,

 Richard

 On 2021-11-19 8:41 p.m., Abhimonyu Deb wrote:
 > Given the notable list of people who have replied so far, normally
I would keep my mouth shut.
 > However, I do think everyone is missing an important point.
 > 
 > Dave mentions that the machine should be able to play fragile
acetate tapes. The A80’s, 807’s and Otari 5050’s that I’ve
worked with would fail miserably here unless I’m missing something.
 > Abhimonyu Debhttp://linkedin.com/in/abhimonyudeb
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > On Saturday, November 20, 2021, 6:42 AM, James Perrett
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 > 
 > On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 00:55, Richard L. Hess
<[log in to unmask]>
 > wrote:
 > 
 >>
 >> Long ago, a company I think called
 >> "DarkLab" in Germany made EIA to DIN adapters out of plastic.
 >>
 >>
 > They still make them and sell them on Ebay. I bought some a few
months ago
 > but haven't used them yet.
 > 
 > James.
 > 

 -- 
 Richard L. Hess                  email:
[log in to unmask]
 Aurora, Ontario, Canada                            647
479 2800
 http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm
 Track Format - Speed - Equalization - Azimuth - Noise Reduction
 Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.

-------------------------
Email sent using Optus Webmail

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager