Yes, that's always the moral of that story.
One can know all the rules, but the ears have it.
I don't have a 2.5 TE. My 2.7 C is working OK.
Thanks again.
Ben
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 11:42 AM Gary A. Galo <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> The moral of the story is that you need to try your copy on your equipment
> with the stylus choices at your disposal, and use your ears to decide which
> is best. You should also try a 2.5 TE before making a decision.
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <
> [log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Benjamin Roth-Aroni
> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 11:24 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] [EXTERNAL] [ARSCLIST] Best size and configuration
> for 1926 Victrola 78 in good condition
>
> Thank you, Gary.
>
> I have a 3.3 truncated elliptical in a Stanton 500. I just tried it.
> Actually, the Shure 2.7 Conical sounds much better.
> So far I've tried Shure 4.0 truncated elliptical , 3.5 truncated
> elliptical , 2.8 and 2.7 C and 3.5 FCR from Expert Stylus.
> The 2.7 Conical sounds best. I guess I'll stick with that.
>
> Thanks anyway.
> Regards,
> Ben
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 11:02 AM Gary A. Galo <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Try a 3.3 mil Truncated Elliptical.
> >
> > GG
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <
> > [log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Benjamin Roth-Aroni
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 10:56 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ARSCLIST] Best size and configuration for 1926
> > Victrola 78 in good condition
> >
> > This message did not originate from SUNY Potsdam or one of its trusted
> > senders. Do not open attachments, click on links, or provide your
> > credentials if the source is suspicious.
> >
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> > Please tell me what is the best size and configuration stylus is for a
> > 1926 Victrola 78 rpm in good condition, specifically M-20: Chopin 24
> > Preludes - Cortot.
> >
> > Thank you.
> > Ben Roth
> >
>
|