February 29, 1996
RLIN-L Subscribers and others:
The final phase of format integration will be implemented in RLIN no
later than April 21, 1996. A file of format-integrated test records
will be available for FTP no later than March 25, 1996. With the
announcement of the availability of the test file, we will also
provide instructions for how to access it.
RLG is still prepared to load format-integrated records prior to our
own implementation, as described in the 12/21/95 RLIN-L posting.
Per this memo, those records containing fields and values that are
new or changed with this phase of format integration (e.g., 006
fields) will become error records in RLIN.
We will keep you posted as we make progress toward April 21. As we
indicated previously, we are truly disappointed by this unexpected
slip in our implementation date. We regret any inconvenience this
delay causes any of you.
Karen Smith-Yoshimura (via Ed Glazier)
On behalf of the entire RLG Format Integration Team
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karen Smith-Yoshimura [log in to unmask]
Director, Library & Bibliographic Services
The Research Libraries Group
1200 Villa Street Phone: 415-691-2270
Mountain View, CA 94041-1100 Fax: 415.964.0943
To: [log in to unmask], FIPARTNERS, LBSTEAM, FITEAM, CURE
cc: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
[log in to unmask]
From <@DBSTU1.RZ.TU-BS.DE:[log in to unmask]> Mon Mar 4 05:25:04 1996
Received: from DBSTU1.RZ.TU-BS.DE (dbstu1.rz.tu-bs.de [134.169.1.1]) by rs8.loc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id FAA35568 for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 05:22:07 -0500
Received: from rznb0.rz.tu-bs.de by DBSTU1.RZ.TU-BS.DE (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with TCP; Mon, 04 Mar 96 11:21:46 MEZ
Received: from charon.biblio.etc.tu-bs.de by rznb0.rz.tu-bs.de with SMTP
(1.37.109.4/15.6) id AA29883; Mon, 4 Mar 96 11:20:12 +0100
Received: From BIBLIO/WORKQUEUE by charon.biblio.etc.tu-bs.de
via Charon-4.0A-VROOM with IPX id 100.960304111901.320;
04 Mar 96 11:20:17 -0100
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
From: "Bernhard Eversberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Organization: UB der TU-Braunschweig
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 11:18:45 MEZ-1MESZ
Subject: FI testbase further improved
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.22
Format integration testbase improved
Now also available via telnet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Several users had reported missing items in our format integration
test database.
We have further improved it and made sure all records and all fields
are now there. The display has been improved as well, and there's
context sensitive help now (type 'h' on menu).
The archive file was reduced to 255 K to improve FTP access.
This is how to get it:
ftp 134.169.20.1
anonymous
<your e-mail as password>
cd formate
bin
hash
get formint.exe
quit
Copy formint.exe to any directory, then say "formint" to unwrap it.
After this, say "tag" to start using the database.
(You must have ANSI.SYS installed or you get a garbled display)
The database is available now by telnet as well:
(implemented on a SUN workstation at present; it might also run on Linux)
telnet 134.169.20.2
opac
opac
marc
Regards, B.E.
From ndmso Wed Mar 6 10:20:58 1996
Received: (from ndmso@localhost) by rs8.loc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA63483; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 10:20:58 -0500
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 10:20:57 -0500 (EST)
From: account for net dev and marc <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Guidelines for the Use of Field 856
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
The _Guidelines for the Use of Field 856_ has been revised. It is
available at the following URL:
http://www.loc.gov/marc/856guide.html
The document now includes links to other related sites and documents.
A text version is still available through the list archives (and from LC
MARVEL):
gopher://marvel.loc.gov:70/.listarch/usmarc/856guide.txt
Through email: send message to [log in to unmask] with text:
get usmarc 856guide.txt
********************************************
Rebecca S. Guenther
MARC Standards Specialist
Network Development & MARC Standards Office
Library of Congress
Washington, D.C. 20540-4102
Phone: 202-707-5092; FAX: 202-707-0115
[log in to unmask]
********************************************
From [log in to unmask] Mon Mar 11 18:09:39 1996
Received: from dewey.newcastle.edu.au ([log in to unmask] [134.148.192.1]) by rs8.loc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA73865 for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:09:32 -0500
Received: by dewey.newcastle.edu.au (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
id AA20631; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 10:09:29 +1100
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 10:09:29 +1100 (EST)
From: Giles S Martin <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: "v" subfields in MeSH
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc: Giles Martin <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
With format integration, "v" subfields are now available for form
subdivisions in 6XX fields. I understand that LC has not decided to use
"v" subfields -- and this would probably be because it would need to
decide with LCSH subdivisions are form subdivisions (not an easy task!).
However, MeSH already makes a distinction between "topical subheadings"
and "form subheadings", although it has coded both as "x" subfields in
the past. Does the National Library of Medicine intend to change its
practice and implement the "v" subfield for MeSH?
Giles
#### ## Giles Martin
####### #### Quality Control Section
################# University of Newcastle Libraries
#################### New South Wales, Australia
###################* E-mail: [log in to unmask]
##### ## ### Phone: +61 49 215 828 (International)
Fax: +61 49 215 833 (International)
##
The web of our life is of a mingled yarn, good and ill together
-- All's Well That Ends Well, IV.iii.98-99
From [log in to unmask] Tue Mar 12 11:24:23 1996
Received: from hsc.usc.edu ([log in to unmask] [128.125.253.156]) by rs8.loc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA129848 for <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 11:24:22 -0500
Received: (from mwfreed@localhost)
by hsc.usc.edu (8.7.2/8.7.2/usc)
id IAA06552; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 08:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 08:24:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Maggie Wineburgh-Freed <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
cc: Multiple recipients of list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: "v" subfields in MeSH
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
I recently asked Winnie Kao, principal cataloger at NLM, whether they
were going to implement the new v subfield, and she said they were NOT at
this time. Perhaps someone from NLM will provide more information about
their plans to the list.
Maggie
Maggie Wineburgh-Freed USC Norris Medical Library
aka Maggie Freed 2003 Zonal Avenue
[log in to unmask] Los Angeles, CA 90033
213/342-1973 Fax: 213/221-1235
From ndmso Wed Mar 13 09:12:58 1996
Received: (from ndmso@localhost) by rs8.loc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA95380; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 09:12:57 -0500
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 09:12:57 -0500 (EST)
From: account for net dev and marc <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Change in list software
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thursday, March 14, 1996, the USMARC list will switch to the Listserv
software, rather than Listproc. Many users will already be familiar with
Listserv, since many lists use it. It is essentially the same as what
USMARC-L used when it ran from the University of Maine several years
ago. (However, at the time the software wasn't available for UNIX
machines that LC was using.) We have had some problems with Listproc,
particularly delivery problems, and Listserv provides some additional
functionality.
Although we originally thought we would convert the subscriber list,
there are some complexities to doing that which would be difficult with a
list having as many subscribers as USMARC. Consequently, everyone will
need to resubscribe tomorrow (Thurs., Mar. 14). Any messages sent to
[log in to unmask] or to [log in to unmask] will use the new software beginning
tomorrow morning after about 8:00. To resubscribe, do the following:
Send message to [log in to unmask] with text:
subscribe usmarc firstname lastname
where you substitute your first and last names. Do not include any other
text in the message.
Messages to the list will still be sent to [log in to unmask]
You will receive documentation when you resubscribe on Listserv commands.
The major differences from Listproc are the set commands, where you had
to use "set usmarc mail <option>" instead of now "set usmarc
<option>". In addition, the "nomail", "ack" and "repro" are different.
We apologize for any inconvenience in resubscribing.
From [log in to unmask] Wed Mar 13 14:59:52 1996
Received: from nlm.nih.gov (nes.nlm.nih.gov [130.14.70.30]) by rs8.loc.gov (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA83025 for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 14:59:51 -0500
From: [log in to unmask]
Received: from occshost.nlm.nih.gov (occshost [130.14.70.21]) by nlm.nih.gov (8.7.3/8.6.11) with SMTP id OAA13587 for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 14:59:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: by occshost.nlm.nih.gov (5.65+/1.3)
id 21813.AA; Wed, 13 Mar 96 15:00:20 GMT
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 96 15:57:00 EST
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: FI-2 and the "v" subfields at NLM
After delays due to the US federal government urloughs and the January
blizzard, NLM has rescheduled the implementation of USMARC Format
Integration, Phase 2 for the week of April 8-12.
USMARC bibliographic records reflecting the Phase 2 fixed field
additions/changes will begin to appear in NLM's weekly 'CATLINE' tape
distribution on April 11 and in NLM's monthly 'CATLINE' and 'AVLINE'
tape distribution on May 2.
NLM does NOT currently have any plans to implement the "v" subfield for
MeSH headings.
Marti Scheel
Systems Unit, Cataloging Section
National Library of Medicine
[log in to unmask]
|