LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EAD Archives


EAD Archives

EAD Archives


EAD@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EAD Home

EAD Home

EAD  April 1996

EAD April 1996

Subject:

EAD reactions, comments, and suggestions

From:

Richard Szary <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Encoded Archival Description List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:24:25 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (86 lines)

This is the first of several messages that I will forward to the list
concerning the reaction here at Yale to our experience with the EAD dtd.  We
have had three Yale repositories (the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript
Library, the Special Collections Department of the Yale Divinity Library,
and Manuscripts and Archives) working on the dtd for some months now.  To
some extent, our comments are informed by our experiences with the FINDAID
dtd and ongoing discussion we have been having since last April's meeting in
Berkeley.  My apologies for missing Daniel's Tuesday deadline.

A bit of background might be useful.  Following demonstration of the
original Berkeley FINDAID database, discussions with the Berkeley team and
colleagues at last April's meeting, and experience with a few prototype
encoded finding aids, the above three repositories here at Yale were
sufficiently impressed with the progress made and confident enough of the
general direction, that we decided to pursue a more active role in helping
to evaluate, develop, and implement the dtd.  Rather than work int he
abstract, we decided to acquire a package that would support maintenance,
indexing, and delivery of SGML documents and reviewed a number of packages
last summer.  Our requirements included the ability to deliver SGML
documents to workstations across the Yale campus (and to the larger research
community) that had access to the campus network and the Internet and to
readily available searching and viewing software.  We chose the OpenText
software package for the maintenance, indexing, and delivery functions, and
Panorama from SoftQuad as the viewing software for users.  Our working
assumption has been that we would deliver the marked-up finding aids through
the World Wide Web using Panorama as a helper application.  Our charge in
evaluating software was also to keep in mind potential uses for delivering
other full-text databases in the Library.  OpenText's ability to handle a
wide variety of text files (including SGML) and to work with documents
mounted on multiple platforms were strong features in its favor.  We also
acquired the Latitude Web Server package from OpenText which provides a
web-based interface to the OpenText database language (PAT).  This allows us
to construct HTML forms for user searching of the finding aid database.

Since the OpenText software arrived last fall, we have installed it on the
Yale Library server and loaded the pre-alpha (October 1995 version) of the
EAD.  We used this as our learning experience with OpenText since the alpha
EAD with examples wasn't yet available.  We have resolved most of our
questions about how to mount and run and application on OpenText and are in
the process of mounting the alpha EAD with available examples.

Simultaneously with the systems work, another group of "Text Deployers" has
been working with the alpha EAD to evaluate how well it meets our structural
and content needs.  Two of the repositories are using WordPerfect for
Windows SGML edition for creating marked up finding aids and one is using
Author/Editor.  Our working assumption is that each repository will choose
the document creation/encoding environment that fits best with its
particular environment, but that we will not prescribe a particular software
approach to markup.  As long as each repository provides the server with
valid, encoded finding aids, we are not concerned about how they created
them.  That's a bit of overstatement since we are comparing notes about the
effectiveness of the various tools and whether it is of benefit to
standardize on a common set of encoding tools, but the basic assumption of
source independence still holds.  We are all using Panorama Pro to create
our prototype style sheets and to test our assumptions about display and
navigation.

Another working assumption is that most, if not all, of the repositories
will continue to create finding aids as they currently are doing (using w-p
software) and the vast majority of the markup will be done through macros or
scripts once the finding aid is complete.  This leverages our existing
experience with our existing systems, but obviously depends on each
repository having a standard format for its finding aids that will make
automatic markup feasible.  Fortunately, that is the case for all three of
us. If this works, we will not be using an SGML editor for document
creation, but only for validation and special editing that the macros and
scripts can't handle.

The Yale Library was kind enough to sponsor a visit by Daniel week before
last and we were able to clarify many of our assumptions and discuss our
questions with him.

Within a month, we should have a small set of encoded finding aids and some
basic search forms operational for testing.  When that happens, we will let
you all know the url so you can peek in and see what we've been up to.

I'd be happy to forward any questions to the group here or refer you to
specific people who are focusing on particular software or implementation
strategies.

More to follow on specific issues and concerns.

Rich Szary
Manuscripts and Archives
Yale University Library

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
December 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager