Steven et. al.,
Reviewing some of my encoding I found that I have run into a few similar
situations, but decided to handle them differently. Here's an example:

Ledgers:
Box Microfilm Reels Contents
  3 1 1920-1921
                2 1922-1923
                3 1924-1925

<C02 LEVEL="SUBSERIES"><DID><UNITTITLE>Ledgers:</UNITTITLE></DID>

<C03><DID><UNITLOC LOCTYPE="CONTAINER" CONTAINERTYPE="BOX">3</UNITLOC>
<UNITLOC LOCTYPE="CONTAINER" CONTAINERTYPE="REEL">1</UNITLOC>
<UNITTITLE>1920-1921</UNITTITLE></DID></C03>

<C03><DID><UNITLOC LOCTYPE="CONTAINER" CONTAINERTYPE="REEL">2</UNITLOC>
<UNITTITLE>1922-1923</UNITTITLE></DID></C03>

etc...

The only problem with doing it this way is that Panorama isn't able to
recognize the attribute differences between the different types of
unitlocs, so displays anything marked with unitloc as "Box No. #" Right
now we're holding out for Dynaweb, and my hopes are that it will be able to
use the attribute in determining the appropriate prefix, displaying as:

Box No. 3
        Microfilm Reel 1 1920-1921
        Microfilm Reel 2 1922-1923

For those with Dynaweb experience, is it possible for the Dynaweb
Stylesheets to do this?

Stephen

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Stephen Douglas Miller
Digital Encoding Archivist
Special Collections Library
Duke University
Durham, NC 27708

[log in to unmask]
http://www.duke.edu/~sdmiller/