Dear Mac,
The UKMARC record as we in the British Library see it reads:
001 0192800477#
008 970203$as1996$ben$de$e0$f0$g0$h0$i1$leng$nb$oa$pW#
015.00/0 $ab96X5457#
021.10/0 $a0192800477$bm#
024.00/0 $a47823566$c+UKX#
040.00/0 $aBDS#
082.00/0 $a650.03$c21#
245.32/0 $aA dictionary of business#
250.00/0 $a2nd ed#
260.00/0 $aOxford$bOxford University Press$c1996#
300.00/0 $a537p$bill$c20 cm$epbk#
350.00/0 $a<POUND>7.99 : Formerly CIP#
490.00/0 $aOxford paperback reference#
503.00/0 $aOriginally published as: Concise dictionary of
business.1990#
503.00/1 $aPrevious ed. published as: A concise dictionary of
business. 1990#
514.00/0 $aCover title: Oxford dictionary of business#
650.00/0 $aBusiness$xDictionaries#
745.12/0 $aA concise dictionary of business#
745.10/1 $aOxford dictionary of business#
How does that compare with your view?
We do not use 246 yet: all variant titles are dumped in 745s.
Brian
UKMARC Office
[log in to unmask]
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: 246 in UK record
Author: "J. McRee Elrod" <[log in to unmask]> at Internet
Date: 09/05/97 14:58
Are there differences in UKMARC of which I am unaware?
The UKMARC record for A dictionary of business, 015 B96X5457, 020
0192800477, has a 246 for a related work, with an initial article, and a
final period.
When harmonization of MARCs occurs however, it would be nice to get 503
back (this record has one justifying the 246 mentioned above), and to
follow them in having "Includes index" in 504 (since that where is goes
when combined with "bibliographical references").
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
|