>While I would disagree with calling some of these "fantasy" (as opposed to
>SF), and think some (many I have not read yet) entertaining, but too slight
>to include even in a Top 100 list, the main point that needs to be made is
>that they are not listed in chronological order at all.
>
>- Tim Slater
Au contraire, mein Freund. The list is indeed arranged from earliest to
most recent novel (by date of original English language publication). What
evidence have you to the contrary?
|