Now that we all seem to be moving in the direction of understanding
and implementing SGML mark-up, I am going to open a can of worms
about a further step in making finding aids usable...namely:
In the development of our Finding Aids site at Yale, we were
happy to realize that we could code non-Latin (extended) characters=20
so they would appear properly, thanks to the Special Characters Entity
When our finding aids were online, we tested the search interface and found
that, indeed, we could find extended characters by keying-in ASCII
number sequences (e.g. Alt-130 =3D =E9). However, the wind left our sails
when we realized that this was the ONLY way to search extended characters.
Therefore, a researcher looking through our collection of Goethe manuscripts
have to learn to type like a programmer to find all of the relevant names=
Knowing that there are other problems that arise, such as an inconsistency
in using extended characters, and local practice, I wonder if anyone has
any advice/direction/comments on what can be done as far as what I
refer to as "character normalization".
I envision a system that - on the search interface - is able to map all
accented versions of Latin characters to their unaccented equivalents.
(e.g. - =E9, =EB, etc. would map to e)
Is this the way to go? Is anybody aware of a system that can do such
a normalization? Our default strategy is to do what we have done
with our in-house database - keep a "printable" version with extended
characters - and create a database version with extended characters stripped
out and replaced by Latin equivalents.
Any response would be welcome, even regarding correct terminology for this
Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library
New Haven, CT 06520