LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for FEDLIB Archives


FEDLIB Archives

FEDLIB Archives


FEDLIB@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FEDLIB Home

FEDLIB Home

FEDLIB  June 1998

FEDLIB June 1998

Subject:

UC Tech Services May Minutes

From:

Marcia D Talley <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

FEDLIB: Federal Librarians Discussion List

Date:

Mon, 22 Jun 1998 11:20:31 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (131 lines)

From your 1997-98 OCLC Users' Council Delegates:
   Benard Strong          Marcia Talley
   [log in to unmask]        [log in to unmask]
   ph: 202-287-9463       ph: 410-293-6905


NOTES OF THE OCLC USERS COUNCIL
TECHNICAL SERVICES INTEREST GROUP
MAY 19-20, 1998


Larry Alford, Leader
Marcia Talley, Recorder


The Technical Services Interest Group of the OCLC Users' Council met on
Tuesday and Wednesday, May 19-20, 1998

Susan Walker gave an update and lead the discussion on WorldCat
Collection Sets which is OCLC's new name for the major microform sets.
Upcoming enhancements include automated FTP of all sets, an appropriate
856 field in the record and open sets which are updated on a regular
basis for electronic materials sets.  Discussion centered around
frequency of updates (monthly?  quarterly?) with monthly being
preferred, how to handle changes to the records, withdrawal of items by
providers and pricing.  Of 388 questionnaires sent out in a recent
survey, 278 were returned saying that 40% of the respondents were likely
to purchase.  OCLC is looking for volunteers to partner with OCLC in the
cataloging of these sets in exchange for cataloging credits and other
benefits.  OCLC plans to investigate adding the following sets: JSTOR,
IAC Infotrac, ABI/INFORM, Wilson, Project Muse, and Academic Press
IDEAL.  TSIG suggested adding UMI and ProquestDirect.

Eric Childress and Linda Gabel updated the group on the OCLC Small
Library Initiative. This user-friendly suite of products, designed for
small libraries such as public libraries serving populations of under
25,000 and school libraries, K-12, will provide www internet access to
cataloging, union catalog, ILL, reference and various selection tools
using an interface to FirstSearch.  OCLC intends to market this product
to small libraries via consortia.  Results of the pilot with INFOhio
have been enthusiastic.  Libraries report finding 100% of the materials
they search, including multi-media products. TSIG members strongly
endorsed this product, pointing out that it would be ideal for all kinds
of small libraries, especially special libraries such as those in law
firms, hospitals, churches, etc.  Things that need to be decided include
a name for the product, pricing and whether or not to include an option
to print local catalog cards.

Marda Johnson presented an update on original cataloging credits.
Members are holding steady with the level of credits but OCLC is looking
for ways to increase original cataloging including Z39.50 uploading
(under development) and importing from local systems via CatME.  OCLC
will communicate progress made with local systems to users.  This
section concluded with a short discussion on the ethics of full OCLC
members who search and export OCLC records to local systems without
attaching their holdings.  OCLC believes cases of this are isolated, but
has developed ways to detect and charge for these as FTUs.

Ellen Caplan provided a brief description of the new LDR updating
service and updated TSIG members on the results of the pilot.  Problems
encountered in the pilot include local interpretations of USMARC, old
practices (such as cataloging multiple versions), input errors and
special local programming.  Questions to be answered include whether or
not to send certain records (like multimedia) and whether increasing the
number of LDRs will affect searching, storage and offline products.
Plans call for the LDR service to be made available 2d quarter 1998 for
interested libraries.  Requirements include union list membership, batch
load capabilities, an ECX account via FTP as well as special
requirements for holdings records.  Loading is free, but there will be
charges for storage, FTP and any customized programming.  Proposed
enhancements include improvements in multi-institution processing,
post-processing reports, adding OCLC symbols prior to the LDR load, 866
coding and punctuation changes for chronology.


The four main points from the TSIG discussion follow:

1.  TSIG reviewed the actions OCLC has taken in follow-up to the
recommendations of the Original Cataloging Task Force.  The group agreed
that OCLC's response has been satisfactory and that the report and
follow-up can be considered closed.

2.  As a part of its final discussion on the report of the Original
Cataloging Task Force, TSIG expressed concern about libraries that do
not load all of their holdings information into the OLUC and are,
therefore, not in compliance with their Full Member agreements.
Libraries that use the system to borrow from other libraries and use
original cataloging created by other libraries but do not batch-load
their holding symbol when they obtain cataloging records (mostly LC)
from other sources are not "playing fair."  TSIG views this a "good
citizen" issue that OCLC and the Regional Networks should take very
seriously.

3.  TSIG heard a report on the new WorldCat Collection Sets service.
The group thought the new service is an excellent idea but encouraged
OCLC to develop the service in a way that allows flexibility in updating
changes to individual records and adding new records to sets already
purchased.

4.   TSIG heard a report from staff on OCLC's Small Library Initiative.
The group thought this new service will be of enormous benefit to
libraries that do not currently use OCLC services.  TSIG encouraged OCLC
to customize the service for individual libraries as much as possible
and to be as flexible as possible in allowing libraries to choose which
parts of the service they need and want to use.  The group also
encouraged OCLC to find a word other than "small" to describe the
service.

Suggested agenda suggestions for next year include:

1.  More detailed reporting from OCLC staff on Year 2000 compliance
progress in core services.  Tell us both the good and the bad.

2.  A session on Internet vs. TCP/IP access discussing the pros and cons
and how libraries are being educated about telecom access so they can
make an informed choice.  This could be a joint session with
Communications and Access.

3.  As OCLC moves to fuller compliance with standards, there is a gap in
how third-party local system vendors implement those standards.  A
discussion about the role of OCLC and the library community in getting
the vendors to comply with standards might be helpful to OCLC, its
member libraries, and the third-party vendors.

(It seems to me that this is an important topic that could turn into a
task force report or position paper from OCLC member libraries via OCLC
to the library and vendor community.)

4.  Further discussion of OCLC plans to include Table of Contents
information in WorldCat.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager