LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for NLS-REPORTS Archives


NLS-REPORTS Archives

NLS-REPORTS Archives


NLS-REPORTS@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NLS-REPORTS Home

NLS-REPORTS Home

NLS-REPORTS  November 1998

NLS-REPORTS November 1998

Subject:

Network Bulletin 98-61

From:

National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

NLS Documents for Network Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 13 Nov 1998 15:47:51 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (330 lines)

Network Bulletin No. 98-61

Date: November 13, 1998

Subject: Collection development

Index term: National Advisory Group on Collection Building
Activities, 1998; recommendations and NLS responses

Enclosed is a copy of the responses to the recommendations
made by the National Advisory Group on Collection Building
Activities at the meeting September 16-18, 1998.

Enclosure

For further information contact:
Ruth J. Foss
Head, Collection Development Section

___________________________________________________________

Attachment

Recommendations of the 1998 National Advisory Group
on Collection-Building Activities with NLS Responses

1. Committee recommends that NLS make it a high priority to
update the Magazines in Special Media catalog.

Response:
The 1998 revision to Magazines in Special Media is now
available in large print and on the NLS website.  It will
also be produced in cassette, flexible disc, and braille
formats.

2. Committee recommends that NLS review the current
collection production rates in relation to existing policy
statements, such as the allocation of children's and
foreign-language materials, and fiction to nonfiction
ratios.

Response:
The Collection Development and Production Control Sections
have recently adjusted NLS production rates to achieve the
desired balance between adult and juvenile, and braille and
recorded materials.  For example, juveniles (defined by
NLS as children thirteen years and under) represent
approximately five percent of the national readership.
However, to encourage reading at an early age,  NLS will
continue to produce twenty-two percent (reduced from thirty-
six percent) of the titles selected for this audience.
Similarly, only two or three percent of NLS adult readers
use braille, although NLS, to promote braille literacy, will
continue to produce twenty-two percent of selected materials
in braille and print-braille (reduced from thirty-two
percent in recent years).

Fiction versus nonfiction and current versus retrospective
ratios are considered at every stage, beginning with
selection.  Although CDS monitors the book publishing market
closely, we are aware that what is available in print at any
given time may influence our ability to maintain the
balances stated by NLS policies.  Similarly, the
availability of narrators or the workload of producers may
affect balances temporarily.

One of CDS's primary responsibilities is to examine the
collection to verify what it contains, to understand its
strengths and weaknesses, and to determine what needs to be
weeded and what needs to be added.  In performing these
duties, we welcome suggestions from this committee, NLS
network library staff, and readers.

Please see Response No. 5 concerning foreign-language
materials.

3. Committee recommends that NLS increase the number of
fiction titles, including bestsellers by popular authors, in
braille as well as recorded format.

Response:
We will make more fiction titles by popular authors
available in braille.  However, most popular titles,
particularly bestsellers, will still need to be produced in
a recorded format.  As you know, production in duplicate
formats will reduce the total number of new titles that will
be made available annually.

Some fiction titles are simply too ephemeral in nature to
justify the additional expense of braille production and
long-term storage.  We are also committed to meeting the
informational needs and preferences of all readers.
Nonfiction, therefore, will remain an important part of the
NLS collections.

4. Committee recommends that NLS include in its outreach
efforts children who are mainstreamed in schools.

Response:
NLS has consistently provided information to a wide range of
organizations involved with mainstreaming issues and
children who are mainstreamed.  NLS has implemented all
available options.  State and local librarians, however, can
work with their boards of education.  Person-to-person
contact at the regional and subregional library is perceived
as a very effective approach.

5. Committee recommends that NLS continue to produce a
minimum of thirty-five foreign-language titles per year,
with an emphasis on Spanish, not excluding other languages.

Response:
Unfortunately, the FY 99 budget will limit NLS production of
foreign-language titles to twenty-five.  Also, please bear
in mind that currently a single producer, who employs one or
two narrators, is under contract to produce titles in
Spanish for NLS.  Due to the economics of contracting
procedures, it may not be feasible for a producer to
audition, employ, and retain a narrator to record a small
number of titles other than Spanish.  If NLS were to
consider producing talking books in a foreign language
besides Spanish, it would be to produce up to five titles in
one other language only, most likely Vietnamese.

For the most part, the NLS foreign-language collection will
continue to be developed by purchasing recorded materials in
various languages from producers, including foreign agencies
for the blind and commercial sources.  This mechanism allows
NLS to include many more foreign languages in the collection
than would be possible if NLS tried to produce all foreign-
language materials itself.

6. Committee recommends that NLS continue to produce all
titles in an existing series, as defined in the 1997
recommendations.  A series, as defined by the committee, is
a collection of books with a continuous story line that must
be read sequentially.  Since some titles may be out of
print, we recommend that NLS pursue every means of obtaining
these titles.

Response:
We will continue our attempt to do so.  Unfortunately, a
vacant library technician position in CDS tends to slow the
effort to locate out-of-print titles.

7. Committee recommends that the braille-formatted files of
magazine texts be included with the other braille material
available through the NLS website.

Response:
NLS will focus first on mounting braille books on the NLS
website through the Web-Braille project.  In the last
quarter of fiscal year 1999 NLS will investigate adding
braille magazines.

8. Committee recommends that NLS narrators insert an
appropriate pause where necessary to indicate a transition
between the sections of a book.

Response:
The use of pauses to indicate transitions between sections
of a book is a practice used by skilled NLS narrators.  NLS
will encourage studio narrators and monitors to make full
use of this technique.

9. Committee recommends that NLS encourage network libraries
to continue to share their volunteer recordings through the
Union Catalog.

Response:
This is done on an ongoing basis through suggestions made
during consultant visits and by encouraging network
librarians to participate in the quality assurance program
at the Multistate Center East.  Earlier this year, the
Bibliographic Control Section (BCS) implemented an
electronic and paper process by which network libraries can
submit "in-process" information for titles they are working
on.  This information is included in the BPHI file on Web-
BLND and updated weekly.  BCS is also developing a process
for libraries to submit cooperative cataloging
electronically.

10. Committee recommends that NLS produce its bibliographies
in large print, computer diskette, and recorded formats, and
make the bibliographies available on the NLS webpage.

Response:
NLS-produced subject bibliographies are currently available
in large-print, braille, and recorded formats.  NLS is
beginning, and will continue, to mount these bibliographies
on its webpage.  We have no plans to provide them on
computer diskette.  On the other hand, network libraries
have the option of downloading NLS bibliographies and making
them available to readers in diskette among other formats.

11. Committee recommends that NLS pursue the production of
titles on alternative medicine and stress reduction in
braille as well as recorded formats.

Response:
We will do so.  At least twenty such titles are currently in
process. Other subject headings that may be used to locate
related titles include: holistic medicine, healing, mind and
body, relaxation, yoga, massage, meditation, stress, herbs,
folk medicine, chiropractic, and health.

12. Committee recommends that NLS improve access to network
library- produced bibliographies via the Internet.

Response:
NLS continues to look at ways to accomplish this goal.
Listing network-produced bibliographies is the easy part.
However, by doing so we create an expectation that a network
library can provide a copy to anyone who requests it; this
is not always possible.   We also may create the expectation
that a network-produced bibliography will be similar to an
NLS-produced bibliography, which is also not always the
case.

13. Committee recommends that NLS encourage network
libraries to download  braille-formatted materials from the
NLS website to computer diskettes for distribution to
patrons who have no access to the Internet.

Response:
NLS will explore this option.

14. Committee recommends, for the second time, that NLS
include the volume number, issue number, and date on the
first side of each recorded magazine since this information
is displayed on the title page of braille magazines.

Response:
The date is included.  The NLS Engineering Change Control
Board will consider the inclusion of issue and volume
numbers.

15. Committee recommends that NLS update its reference
circulars pertaining to materials not produced by NLS, such
as educational and reference books, and announce the
availability of these reference circulars in Talking Book
Topics (TBT) and Braille Book Review (BBR).

Response:
The NLS Reference Section produces new and revised
publications, including bibliographies and circulars,
annually.  An up-to-date catalog of all reference titles
appears in Facts: Books for Blind and Physically Handicapped
Individuals, published each year in January.  New
bibliographies and circulars, as published, are also posted
on the NLS website and announced in TBT and BBR.

An update of Reference Books in Special Media is in process.

16. Committee recommends that, because many patrons comment
on their difficulty in hearing high-pitched voices, the NLS
Research and Development staff investigate playback devices
that have the capability of adjusting the pitch of the voice
without affecting the speed.

Response:
With analog cassette technology, independently adjusting
speed and pitch is not economically feasible.  Digital
technology, however, makes it more practical.  Independently
adjustable speed and pitch is one of the features to be
included in the digital talking book presently in
development.

17. Committee recommends that, at the end of a cassette
book, the narrator instruct the reader to either rewind or
fast forward the tape, whichever is appropriate.

Response:
This suggestion has been previously considered by the NLS
Engineering Change Control Board and failed to win its
approval.  The ECCB believes that patrons could interpret
this instruction as condescending or demeaning.  Moreover,
NLS policy recommends that all returned books be opened and
inspected by the library upon return.  If necessary, rewind
or fast forward can be done at that time.

18. Committee commends the Collection Development Section
Head, Ruth Foss, and staff for their excellent facilitation
of this meeting, including travel arrangements, hotel
accommodations, and transportation.

Response:
Thank you.  We too are pleased that all of these
arrangements went smoothly.

19. Committee commends the NLS staff for its attention to
and prompt action in the implementation of the
recommendations of the 1997 committee.

Response:
Thank you.  The ability to fill librarian positions has been
most helpful.

20. Committee commends NLS for its continued solicitation of
suggestions from patrons and network librarians for
selection of library materials.

Response:
We will continue to do so.

21. Committee commends NLS for its leadership in providing
patrons and network staff with improved access to the Union
Catalog through electronic media, for example, the CD-ROM
catalog, and the World Wide Web.

Response:
NLS will continue to explore ways, including new technology,
to improve access to the collections.

22. Committee commends NLS for its continued effort toward
providing a balanced collection of titles with and without
explicitly sexual content.

Response:
This remains an ongoing effort.

23. Recognizing that patrons must have playback equipment in
order to access the NLS recorded collection, the committee
commends  the Materials Development Division for procuring,
maintaining, and supplying a sufficient number of machines.

Response:
Everyone involved in this process appreciates your
recognition.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager