Hi, I just tried to click onto Ana Cristan's email address for a reply to her, and got a 404 note, so my apologies if I've misdirected this message. I read with great interest the summary of the BIBCO-at-large meeting, particularly those remarks by the speaker from the Eastman School of Music, asking about coding as "pcc" materials in which the access points were conformable, but the description was non-standard. I had just approached our BIBCO trainer with a similar question--whether I could code as pcc core those records for videorecordings where the access points were authorized but the descriptive elements (particularly the 5XX notes) were out of strict AACR2 order. He pointed me to the remarks mentioned above-- and their conclusion-- and reminded me that all elements of description and analysis in the entire record have to be in apple-pie order. Original cataloging I can do as prescribed. There's a lot of copy for these materials nowadays, and that's where the problem lies. I used to spend a great deal of time re-arranging notes I found on copy cataloging, which with our system requires repeated cutting and pasting. To save time and get the material available sooner, I've schooled myself not to do that any longer, but I do try to make sure that the required notes are on the record somewhere. It would be an additional great savings of time if we could have some kind of code or marking to indicate at least that the 7XX's were valid, as they are multitudinous on records for videorecordings-- I'd *love* not to have to keep checking, especially those names I vaguely recognize from other videos I processed not long ago. Thank you and best regards, Jean E. Craig University of Pennsylvania Van Pelt Library/IPC: Original cataloging