 |
 |
Yes, we did discuss this and Millie is correct in her recollection. We will just have to test how this works over time-- it was said at the meeting that the 50 documents should be no problem for any of the languages being requested for addition to 639-1. Rebecca On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Milicent K Wewerka wrote: > As John Clews pointed out, the Criteria sections of document N3R do > not match. However, as I recall, this was discussed at the meeting > with the conclusion that the criteria for the two parts of the > standard would continue to differ--especially regarding the "50 > documents" and "significant (or substantial?) body of existing > documents." > > Milicent Wewerka >