We'll correct it. We recently got rid of the Javanese alternatives, since it was just an error. That's the discrepancy-- we just haven't fixed it. Rebecca On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, John Clews wrote: > In the ASCII file "Codes for the representation of names of languages > (Library of Congress)" in the version "Alpha-3 codes arranged > alphabetically by English name of language: Alternative ASCII > version" which I downloaded from the Library of Congress web site on > 2001-11-14, it states that > > "For those 23 languages with alternative codes (bibliographic > and terminology codes), ISO 639-2/B is given first followed > by a slash ("/") and the ISO 639-2/T code." > > However, only 22 languages are listed where 2 codes are separated by > a slash. PLease could you advise me where this discrepancy exists? > > Best regards > > John Clews > > -- > John Clews, > Keytempo Limited (Information Management), > 8 Avenue Rd, Harrogate, HG2 7PG > Email: [log in to unmask] > tel: +44 1423 888 432; > > Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC22/WG20: Internationalization; > Committee Member of ISO/TC37: Terminology >