Error during command authentication.
Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.
Abstract Tag
At the Michigan
State University Library, we also do item level cataloging of the audio
recordings in the Vincent Voice Library. I chose to use the
<abstract> tag to encode the summary of each recording for three
reasons: 1. Since these brief summaries would go in the 520
field if the recording was being cataloged individually, either <abstract>
or <scopecontent> would be appropriate, since the MARC equivalent for
both tags is the 520 field (summary note). 2. However, within the <c>
tag, <scopecontent> could be used only outside the
<did>, while <abstract> could be used within the
<did>. I thought it more appropriate to group all the basic, item-level
descriptive information within the <did> (i.e. <unitid>,
<unittitle>, <unitdate>, <origination>,
<physdesc>). I had also been advised (hopefully correctly)
that having the basic descriptive information all within the <did> would
facilitate the display of search results using X-Pat, which we intend to install
soon. 3. The <note> tag seemed more appropriate for general comments about
the recording, such as "sound quality uneven," rather than for the brief summary
of the recording.
My finding aids do,
of course, have a <scopecontent> note at the highest level, which
describes the contents of the collection in general and the collection's
organization (if the collection is sufficiently complex to have multiple
series), and if possible, points to individual recordings of particular
interest. This information is pulled into the 520 field of the
collection's MARC record. The <abstract> tags are not pulled into the
collection's MARC record, but we hope to make them searchable using X-Pat
soon.
If you'd like
to see what these finding aids look like, use IE 5.0 or 5.5 (because we're
displaying the XML directly) and go to http://www.lib.msu.edu/vincent/findaids . From that
page, you can browse the finding aids by subject or alphabetically. (And if
they won't display, please let me know!)
-----Original Message-----
From:
Carol Bartels [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002
4:02 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Abstract
Tag
We do item level cataloging at the Historic New Orleans
Collection and we use the abstract tag for summarizing the item. Do any
of you who use the abstract tag in this manner or any other matter when you
think about it have a problem with the fact that the paragraph tag, <p>
is not allowed to occur within <abstract> ?
Realizing that at this time there are no harden rules
established for using <scopecontent> or <abstract> for item level
description, would it be better to use <scopecontent> because it
may contain <p>?
Carol Bartels
Documentation
Coordinator
THNOC