 |
 |
I don't see how you can kill responseSchema from SRU. The whole point of SRU was the clients ability to specify a responseSchema whose contents were greater than an SRW response. If I want a button on the screen that says "Next Five Records", then there better be the data in the response that I can put behind that button. Remember, there is no processing of the response, simply reformatting from XML to HTML. Ralph -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Dovey [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:28 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: issues list I wondering if we can't kill two of these off. Firstly the time to live issue. The vote seems to be against me on this so shall we agree that the TTL is a hint (not guaranteed) and is a duration, which seems to be the consensus. Secondly responseSchema... As I see it we only need 2 schemas (given the assumption that explain is now a record syntax returned in a standard response) - one for SRU and one for SRW: The responseSchema idea came up when we were trying to combine the two and there were some additional elements needed by browsers which were not really relevant in the SOAP version. I'd like the SRW schema to be an extension of the SRW one rather than an entirely new schema. In this case we can drop responseSchema from both SRU and SRW. Matthew > -----Original Message----- > From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: 05 February 2002 19:31 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: issues list > > > From the recent discussions I've added three new issues > (7-9) at: http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/issues.html > > Please tell me if there are issues missing from the list. > > --Ray >