 |
 |
Like Keld, I too agree with Milicent In message <[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask] writes: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 07:59:10AM -0500, Milicent K Wewerka wrote: > > We have a saying in the U.S.: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." > It seems that having finite appointments adds administrative work. > Is there a definite advantage to finite appointments that makes the > extra work worthwhile? Has there been a problem with the current > practice? Milicent Wewerka It's simplest only to need to appoint if someody resigns, or fails to be able to carry out the required duties. Have a mechanism only for those circumstances, not just adding red tape. Best regards John Clews -- John Clews, Keytempo Limited (Information Management), 8 Avenue Rd, Harrogate, HG2 7PG Email: [log in to unmask] tel: +44 1423 888 432; Committee Member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC22/WG20: Internationalization; Committee Member of ISO/TC37/SC2/WG1: Language Codes