 |
 |
I think this is a good move. Thanks Ray, Janifer -----Original Message----- From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Monday, 6 May 2002 21:58 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: bath prefix for cql In order to move along and provoke discussion, I'm proposing that we define a well-known cql prefix for Bath searches. We can continue to debate whether prefixes must always be discoverable by explain, and the way I see it, some will, and others will be well-known. Thus for example, if Ralph really has a Deep Custard prefix, then he would speak up when DC is proposed as a well-known prefix (and we would agree not to make DC well-known). I'm suggesting a well-known prefix, "bath". (Speak up if you want to otherwise use bath as a prefix.) I've attached a number of searches (19) derived from Bath. Please comment on this; if it looks ok I'd like to put it up on the srw page; we need to get concrete/real examples up soon. --Ray