> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 12:15:26 -0400 > From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]> > > > Then these misbegotten piles of bits are simply not worthy to be > > called SRW servers, surely? We are _defining_ the protocol here. > > Let's not give up on getting it right before we've even started. > > May I infer from your recent postings, the increasing frequency and > intensity, that you're now jumping on the bandwagon and planning to > implement? :-) I would love to implement ZNG if I could possibly find any commercial case for it in my current job (or indeed find a different job where that was doable). But if I'm going to give anything like a reasonable amount of my time to ZOOM, ZeeRex, Zthes and zSQLgate, then I just can't afford to launch into yet another "free time" project. So the answer is: no, I don't have any immediate plans to implement ZNG. But I want to make sure that it's sane, so that when my circumstances change and I _can_ make an implementation, I don't end up tearing my hair out! As for the intensity -- I think that's just me being obnoxious :-) > So maybe you'll reconsider and come to the July meeting? I would really like to, but there is no way that I can either (A) fund my employer to send me, or (B) pay to send myself. Really sorry. (But touched that you want me there :-) _/|_ _______________________________________________________________ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ "Politicians, ad agencies, and other liars are prone to using high-sounding, low-content, prose to back their points. Heck, if people really understood what they were saying, they might be in big trouble" -- Rheal Nadeau.