but then you get the wasted resource you referred to - they may not be a
lot of resources but they are still potentially wasted - but thats ok with
me I suppose


On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Ray Denenberg wrote:

> Mark Needleman - DRA wrote:
> > this seems to be a case of Reference Id in reverse and could be handled
> > the same way - if supplied by the server it must be returned by the
> > client?
> No. What I'm hearing is that we don't want to force anyone to support
> sessions. So if the server supplies one, the client can ignore it. --Ray