> We've also tentatively decided to include an > explicit resultSetId in the request. Should the > request be allowed to include a sortKey in this > case? I.e. a request to sort an existing result So no query, resultset is set and sort is set, meaning apply the sort to the result set. Sounds pretty good to me. Rob -- ,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask]) ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/ ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142 ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777 ____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/ I L L U M I N A T I