 |
 |
Same service is fine, it doesn't need to be in CQL. Janifer -----Original Message----- From: Ray denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Wednesday, 12 June 2002 22:03 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: result set model for srw From: "Robert Sanderson" <[log in to unmask]> > Right, but it doesn't need to be in CQL, it could be an parameter in the > XML request and still be presented at the same time as the search. I think that's what she meant. (Re-reading, she said cql as opposed to a "separate service" but I think she meant srw as opposed to a separate service). Jan?