Print

Print
Their intention was to not require proximity searching.  They did not intend to prohibit it.
 
Ralph
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 2:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Need Feedback on Re: DC Index definitions

"LeVan,Ralph" wrote:
I don't have any interest in supporting an index that only allows single term searches.  That's just plain stupid and a misinterpretation of the intentions of the Bath folks.
(I assume you mean single *word*, not single *term*.)   But the bath word searches use structure value 2. So what *is* their intention?
 

--Ray