 |
 |
First, what do we mean by a word index? In Bath we mean it for searching a single word (Bath uses structure 2). Don't we mean the same for DC? Let's be sure we agree on this one way or the other. Second, the alternative mappings proposed are (1) old architecture (e.g. bib-1) and (2) new architecture (xd, utility, bib-2). Structure value 2 is proposed only for the old. AdjacenyWordList is in the Utility set (new architecture). You can argue that new-architecture-friendly sets can be used with old architecture, if not vice versa, but do we want to do that? Finally --- WordList???? Haven't we depricated that completely out of existence????? --Ray "LeVan,Ralph" wrote: > I'm loading this stuff into a file that I can > process and I noticed that the word indexes have > a Structure attribute of Word (2). Shouldn't > that be out new AdjacencyWordList, or at least > just plain WordList(6)?Thanks!Ralph