Second, the alternative mappings proposed are (1) old architecture (e.g.
bib-1) and (2) new architecture (xd, utility, bib-2). Structure value 2
is proposed only for the old. AdjacenyWordList is in the Utility
set (new architecture). You can argue that new-architecture-friendly sets
can be used with old architecture, if not vice versa, but do we want to
Finally --- WordList???? Haven't we depricated that completely out of existence?????
I'm loading this stuff into a file that I can process and I noticed that the word indexes have a Structure attribute of Word (2). Shouldn't that be out new AdjacencyWordList, or at least just plain WordList(6)?Thanks!Ralph