Print

Print


At 04:38 PM 1/29/2003 -0500, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>In a message dated 1/29/2003 1:36:10 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>
>>Yes it could be called sarcasm. I prefer to call it a "probe" a
>>method
>> >used by Herbert Marshall McCluhan to stimulate thought and get to the
>>bottom
>
>
>I do not understand the comment about Marshall McCluhan.  I have always
>been interested in McCluhan and, although he seemed to be like he was kind
>of crazy, he was also kind of brilliant.  What are you saying about the
>"probe."?

Approximately, he is saying that he knew he was being sarcastic. We who
only read his words, not his mind, are unprepared to participate in the
discussion.

Mike
[log in to unmask]
http://www.mrichter.com/