Print

---

I am not sure that I understand Gerhard's comment here "a separate code is
better". It seems that "mdf" is being balloted as a separate code for
Moksha, while "myv" for Erzya. Gerhard, could you clarify?

Rebecca

On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Gerhard Budin wrote:

> ISO 639 Ballot -- New item: Moksha
>
> Please vote by Friday 2003-01-24.
>
> Please see additional information below the ballot form.
>
> Submitted by (your name, please):
> Gerhard Budin
>
> (A) -- Inclusion:
> (1)
> _x_  I am in favour of including the individual language "Moksha" in 639-2
> (alpha-3 code)
> ___  I am opposed to including the individual language "Moksha" in 639-2
> (alpha-3 code)
>
> (B) -- Identifier:
> (Please vote even if you are opposed to the inclusion of the item)
> (2)
> ___  I accept the alpha-3 identifier "mdf" for Moksha (if to be included)
> _x_  I do not accept the identifier "mdf" -- Comment: a separate code is better
>
> (C) -- Language names:
> (3)
> _x_  I accept the English name "Moksha" (if to be included)
> ___  I do not accept the English name "Moksha" -- Comment:
>
> (4)
> _x_  I accept the French name "mokcha" (if to be included)
> ___  I do not accept the French name "mokcha" -- Comment:
>
> (5)
> _x_  I accept the indigenous name "mokshen' kjal'" (if to be included)
> ___  I do not accept the indigenous name "mokshen' kjal'" -- Comment:
>
>
> Other comments:
>