I'm sorry; I sent that message before I had completed reading my mail. Rebecca On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] Håvard Hjulstad wrote: > That has already been done; I hope you have all received it. > > Regards, > Håvard > > ------------------------- > Håvard Hjulstad mailto:[log in to unmask] > Solfallsveien 31 > NO-1430 Ås, Norway > tel: +47 64963684 & +47 64944233 > mob: +47 90145563 > http://www.hjulstad.com/havard/ > ------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: ISO JAC Voting Member List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of > Rebecca S. Guenther > Sent: 29. januar 2003 15:19 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [JACVOTE] ISO 639 JAC ballot 11-2003 - Southern Altai > > > Perhaps these comments should be sent to the ISOJAC list so that some of > our experts may respond. Does anyone object to that? > > Rebecca > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Anila Angjeli wrote: > > > ISO 639 Ballot -- New item: Southern Altai > > > > > > Submitted by (your name, please): Anila Angjeli > > > > (A) -- Inclusion: > > (1) > > ___ I am in favour of including the individual language "Southern Altai" > in > > 639-2 (alpha-3 code) > > _X_ I am opposed to including the individual language "Southern Altai" in > > 639-2 (alpha-3 code) > > > > Comment : > > I'm presenting here the pont of view of "Les langues du monde" (I have > already > > quoted) about Altaï : > > >From the classification point of view it considers the Altaic groupe as > part of > > the turkish languages > > These languages (with dialectical variants) are spoken in the territories > > previously known as autonomous territoy of Oyrates. > > Two major branches are to be distinguished according to the geographical > > situation of the peoples speaking these languages : that of the languages > spoken > > in the Southern Regions of the territory and the other one comprising > languages > > (and dialects) spoken by the people of the Northern Regions. > > In the Southern Region one distinguishes : > > - The "Altaï" itself [i with diaeresis], indigenous name "Altay-kizi"[z > with > > caron] called "Oyrat" or "Oyröt" or "White Kalmouks" or " Mountain > Kalmouks" by > > the russians ( in russian "gorniye") > > - The Teletout" or "Telenget" (with slight differencies between them). > > > > In the Northern Region of the Altaï groupe it distinguishes : > > the Koumand > > the Tatar cern'eviye - (russian name) or Yis-kizi > > the Sor > > theTatar tomsko-kuzn'etkiye. > > > > I find that the analysis given about Altaï as one of the languages > > spoken in the Southern Region of the Altai Groupe clarifies the > > interest of the requester "in the southern version of Altai as a > > separate language" and the appelation " Gorno-Altaisk" which obviously > > stands for "Altaï of the mountains". That is why I consider it more > > advisable to include Altaï (and not spécifically Southern Altäi) in > > the standard. > > > > (B) -- Identifier: > > (Please vote even if you are opposed to the inclusion of the item) > > (2) > > __ I accept the alpha-3 identifier "alt" for Southern Altai (if to be > > included) > > _X_ I do not accept the identifier "alt" -- Comment: > > Following the above reasoning I shoud rather accept the identifier "alt" > for > > Altai (and not for Southern Altai) > > > > > > (C) -- Language names: > > (3) > > ___ I accept the English name "Southern Altai" (if to be included) > > _X_ I do not accept the English name "Southern Altai" -- Comment: > > For the same reasons I suggest the English name: "Altai" and not "Southern > > Altai" > > > > (4) > > __ I accept the French name "altaï du Sud" (if to be included) > > _X_ I do not accept the French name "altaï du Sud" -- Comment: > > I suggest the French name "altaï" and not "altaï du sud" > > > > >