On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Matthew Dovey wrote:
> Could these relations be generalised
Yes
> and defined in a generic utility set?
No ;)
I like 'contains' for encloses, so I guess I like 'containedBy' for
within. Does Mike have a saves-on-typing suggestion?
Rob
> encloses Data is range, term is point/range
> within Data is point, term is range
> /partial
--
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
