 |
 |
Yes - I'm currently working on some draft notes for local extensions of SRU/SRW (prompted by the "should we support other query languages?" to question to which I think the answer should be "only as a private/local extension"), and I cover this in those. Hopefully I'll post these this weekend (if BT can fix the fault on my phoneline at home!!) Matthew > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: 15 January 2003 15:00 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: 'operation' field for sru > > > This is important for local extensions as well as standard ones. > > In order to debug my resultset handling, I wrote a quick > function to dump them back in a simple XML format. When I > went to add this to SRU, it was impossible without the > operation field. > > Rob > > -- > ,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask]) > ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/ > ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142 > ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: > liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777 > ____/:::::::::::::. WWW: > http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/ > I L L U M I N A T I >