 |
 |
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 06:28:05PM +0200, adam wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:40:50PM +0100, Robert Sanderson wrote: > > > SearchRetrieveRequests etc.). Also whether this is something that would > > > be required to be implemented in SRU as well as SRW. > > > > That's not something that I'd considered. Specifying it in SRU would be a > > complete nightmare if there was multiple queries. Anything more complex > > than a single query fanned out to multiple databases would be absolutely > > horrifying in SRU. > > > > /metadb/query1=ccg.name any "sword" > > &schema1=http://srw.o-r-g.org/schemas/ccg/1.0/ > > &resultSetTTL1=180 > > &sortKeys1="/card/name" > > &database1=l5r > > &recordPacking1=xml > > &query2=... > Doesn't look pretty . An efficient client&server will reuse the socket > and we have a train of GET's (or POST's). And that's with version > SRW/SRU 1.0. > > > GET /db1?query=search1 HTTP/1.0 > User-Agent: Wget/1.8.1 > Host: localhost:9999 > Accept: */* > Connection: Keep-Alive > > GET /db2?query=search2 HTTP/1.0 > User-Agent: Wget/1.8.1 > Host: localhost:9999 > Accept: */*^ > Connection: Keep-Alive PS: in order for this to work efficiently, the server must support HTTP pipelining http://www.mozilla.org/projects/netlib/http/pipelining-faq.html Without pipelining, the server will process request completely and send response before proceeding to the next. -- Adam > > > *cringe* > > > > Rob > > > > -- > > ,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask]) > > ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/ > > ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142 > > ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777 > > ____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/ > > I L L U M I N A T I > > -- > Adam Dickmeiss mailto:[log in to unmask] http://www.indexdata.dk > Index Data T: +45 33410100 Mob.: 212 212 66 -- Adam Dickmeiss mailto:[log in to unmask] http://www.indexdata.dk Index Data T: +45 33410100 Mob.: 212 212 66