> Rob -- Trying to distill your question, I think what you're asking is, is
> there a way to request that a result set be copied to another, new result
> set.
> I don't understand why this would be a candidate:
> > srw.resultsetname=fish and srw.resultsetname=fish
> I don't think we ever came up with a way.
The resultset created by the above query is identical to
srw.resultSetName=fish. Hence should the server be expected copy it or
not?
So really my question is:
If, after all operations on it have taken place, a result set is
identical to the original, should it be treated as a new result set?
Maybe this question is just irrelevant and implementation dependant as
you can never change a result set anyway? I'm not sure :)
Rob
--
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: telnet: nebmedes.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
