Print

Print


>
> From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: 2003/10/23 Thu AM 09:18:28 CDT
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] re discogs and Arhoolie
>
>    I agree with Tom completely on his point about fair use. I also think
> that it would extend to samples (30 seconds or a minute for longer
> recordings) for non-profit internet use.
>    I sincerely hope that UCLA suceeds in establishing some kind of
> precedent for fair use of sound recordings in an cross-institutional,
> networked (as opposed to internet) framework. I think this would help
> the Library of Congress a lot with its ongoing efforts to provide more
> public access to its recorded sound collections.
>    These are just my opinions, and do not represent any official
> Library poilicy. Just so ya know.
>
> James
>
>  >>> [log in to unmask] 10/22/03 07:53PM >>>
> > From: David S Sager <[log in to unmask]>
> > Reply-To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> <[log in to unmask]>
> > Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:40:00 -0400
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [ARSCLIST] re discogs and Arhoolie
> >
>
> It is my position, that large Universities and other large institutions
> need
> to push for a realistic definition of fair use. If the UCLA Library
> has
> something available on their system, why can't it be accessible at any
> library in the UC system, or any associated library at any institution?
> As
> long as it is accessible on computer terminals that only allow
> listening and
> do not allow copying of the sound files in any manner (CD burners,
> email,
> etc), what's the problem?
>
> I know most librarians feel this way too.
>