> > From: James L Wolf <[log in to unmask]> > Date: 2003/10/23 Thu AM 09:18:28 CDT > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] re discogs and Arhoolie > > I agree with Tom completely on his point about fair use. I also think > that it would extend to samples (30 seconds or a minute for longer > recordings) for non-profit internet use. > I sincerely hope that UCLA suceeds in establishing some kind of > precedent for fair use of sound recordings in an cross-institutional, > networked (as opposed to internet) framework. I think this would help > the Library of Congress a lot with its ongoing efforts to provide more > public access to its recorded sound collections. > These are just my opinions, and do not represent any official > Library poilicy. Just so ya know. > > James > > >>> [log in to unmask] 10/22/03 07:53PM >>> > > From: David S Sager <[log in to unmask]> > > Reply-To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List > <[log in to unmask]> > > Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:40:00 -0400 > > To: [log in to unmask] > > Subject: [ARSCLIST] re discogs and Arhoolie > > > > It is my position, that large Universities and other large institutions > need > to push for a realistic definition of fair use. If the UCLA Library > has > something available on their system, why can't it be accessible at any > library in the UC system, or any associated library at any institution? > As > long as it is accessible on computer terminals that only allow > listening and > do not allow copying of the sound files in any manner (CD burners, > email, > etc), what's the problem? > > I know most librarians feel this way too. >