 |
 |
Jimmie & All, I hope others with more "English" background will do more editing but I have a few spots for comments that will hopefully help the report. In the first paragraph: > Through SACO many useful changes and additions have been proposed > and adopted over this time, and the often-heard criticism that LC > is unresponsive to change can be answered. I am not sure that the criticism was LC... it was most often LCSH and sometimes LCC. For simplicity could we change this to "LC Subject Headings? Toward the end under training: The BIBCO training > program includes a session devoted to SACO that is very helpful, > and proposal-specific input from experts at LC is also extremely > valuable for building greater expertise in preparing subject > heading proposals. I don't remember any SACO training as part of our Bibco training. I have previously commented on the Day 5 training as part of the NACO program and how positively it has been received at the institutions that I have trained. As for the report, I've already made lots of comments, many of which were out of sync with these recommendations. Mary Charles