Print

Print


I wouldn't be surprised.  At least they tell you.  I've been playing
'ping-pong' with two ISPs who regect anything that isn't plain text (and
my e-mailer seems to be buggy about stripping out the extras).

E Bradtke


Earl J. Moniz wrote:

> Is this pending delivery for real?
>
>
>
>> X-Authentication-Warning: moniz.org: moniz owned process doing -bs
>> X-Mailer: <SMTP32 v8.04>
>> Date:         Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:55:36 -0500
>> Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
>> Sender: Encoded Archival Description List <[log in to unmask]>
>> From: Spambox <[log in to unmask]>
>> Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [Norton AntiSpam]      Your message is pending delivery...
>> X-NAS-Classification: 1
>> X-NAS-MessageID: 3657
>> X-NAS-Validation: {0A094CE6-EE21-4133-96DF-D6D264EA0441}
>>
>> Your message is pending delivery...
>>
>> Due to the possibility that it may:
>> 1) Contain an attachment which may have a virus.
>> 2) Be regarded as spam by the various filters in place.
>> 3) Be blocked by one of the Real Time Blocking (RBL) services utilized.
>>
>> Please go to www.neh.gov/blockedmail.asp and provide the date, time and
>> subject of the pending message.  Every effort will be made to forward
>> the
>> original message, determine the reason and explain why and if possible
>> prevent it with future messages.
>>
>> Office of Information Resource Management
>>
>> Support provided for:
>> National Endowment for the Humanities
>> Institute of Museum and Library Services
>> President's Committee on The Arts and The Humanities
>