> > Since we agree that cql and srw will have independent versions, how
> > will a client convey the cql version?
> > For that matter if cql is used outside of srw, how is the version to
> > be indicated?
> Sheesh, guys, enough with all these hard questions already! :-)
How about assigning the CQL prefix?
> cql="http://www.loc.gov/zing/cql/context-sets/1.1/"
(See below)
> for the SRW case, the CQL version can be disovered from the ZeeRex
> record. (That's conceptually true, at least -- Rob can tell us
Uhhhh.... ahhhh .... *runs off to look at the DTD* ....
Ummmmm ..... I'll get back to you :P
> > And the cql context set -- do we assume that its version is the same
> > as the cql version?
> I don't think that's a good idea. Clients that care enough to want to
Oh :( Actually, as 'cql' is reserved and can only ever point at the
current CQL set, I thought that it was a fairly good trick for assigning
version.
> BTW., Rob, the CQL set's documentation at
> http://srw.o-r-g.org/cql/contextSets/cql.html
> has gone away.
That would now be at cql/context-sets/cql.html, ala Ray's preference for -
lowercase rather than camelCase (meaning that he can just unzip the whole
set of docs rather than searching for links to rename)
Rob
--
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
____/:::::::::::::.
I L L U M I N A T I
