> There's also the ZeeRex stuff that needs discussion (I know, I know,
> not due to any lack of impetus on _your_ part! :-) before it can be
> nailed down; but as that doesn't live on the MA site, I guess it can
> be handled separately (= later).
I have three agreements from Ralph, Jannifer and Theo. That's enough for
me... if you want to add a contribution, please feel free ;)
> > > You ought to think long and hard before changing the URI of an
> > > established object such as the Record Metadata context set.
> > I did. And if we weren't throwing away 1.0, I wouldn't do it.
> Agreed, if you're going to change it then now is the time. Just so
> long as no-one gets the idea that this is the kind of thing we're
> going to be doing all the time.
Apart from for different versions. (As opposed to errata)
Though that doesn't /change/ the old URI, obviously, it adds a newer one.
Rob
--
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
____/:::::::::::::.
I L L U M I N A T I
