 |
 |
Fine by me. Ralph > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:07 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Scan > > > A couple of things to do with the scan request: > > 1. Can we renamed 'numberOfTerms' as 'maximumTerms' to be > more consistent > with 'maximumRecords' from the search request? > > 2. 'startRecord' and 'maximumRecords' are both optional in the search > request. Can responsePosition and numberOfTerms be > optional. Like the > search request, maximum would be server determined (in > Explain) and > response would default to 1. > > Just cosmetic changes, but more consistent with the search request. > > Rob > > -- > ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask]) > ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/ > ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142 > ,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/ > ____/:::::::::::::. > I L L U M I N A T I >