We didn't clean up these examples and should have when we changed the mapping of 245$h. We are about to regenerate them from MODS 2.0 version to 3.0, so this will change. On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Roy Tennant wrote: > Right, of course we can (and should) strip [electronic resource] out of > the title before populating our MODS <title> tag, but perhaps instead I > should have pointed out that it is also prominent in examples of the > <title> tag on the MODS web site: > > <titleInfo> > <title>Bush Cheney [electronic resource]</title> > </titleInfo> > > I guess that's my _real_ gripe -- that if we are specifying a standard > we should do it more cleanly than that, rather than grandfathering in > kluges from the past. > Roy > > On Jan 23, 2004, at 10:31 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > > > The [electronic resource] comes from the 245 $h. Since the material > > designation is the only content of that subfield, you could just not > > carry that subfield over to the MODS record. It really isn't part of > > the > > title itself, and I know that we always dropped it from indexing and > > from our title browse displays. > > > > kc > > > > On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 10:10, Andrew E Switala wrote: > >> In <nonSort> and <title>, and further in <subTitle>, <partNumber>, and > >> <partName>. The "title" is everything in <titleInfo> and marking up > >> individual parts of the title should assist processing and display, > >> not > >> hinder it. > >> > >> In your example, what *is* [electronic resource] doing in <title>? > >> It's *your* record after all. An electronic resource could be marked > >> as > >> such with <genre authority="marcgt">web site</genre>, a <url> element > >> under <location>, an <internetMediaType> element under > >> <physicalDescription>, and/or an <identifier type="uri"> (if the > >> location is canonical). > >> > >>>>> [log in to unmask] 2004-01-23 12:49:04 >>> > >> Frankly, I find it strange to have a <title> tag that is no such > >> thing. > >> In other words, the <title> cannot be found in the <title>, it must be > >> found in <nonSort> (if such exists) and <title>. How intuitive is > >> that? > >> But if that is the collective wisdom of the group, I can live with it. > >> Meanwhile, to use a local example, this is a sample from one of our > >> MODS records for our online books (see > >> <http://texts.cdlib.org/escholarship/>: > > -- > > ------------------------------------- > > Karen Coyle > > Digital Library Specialist > > http://www.kcoyle.net > > Ph: 510-540-7596 Fax: 510-848-3913 > > -------------------------------------- > > >