Print

Print


Ken, did i miss the solution to Mary's relevant question?

Stanislav Pejsa | Processing Archivist | The Center for Jewish History | 15 W. 16 Street | New York, NY 10011 | [log in to unmask] | (917) 606-8213


-----Original Message-----
From: O'Neill, Ken [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thu, April 15, 2004 4:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Date normalization for B.C.?


The generally accepted, post-colonialist standard is B.C.E - before the
common era.

Ken O'Neill, MA
Program Coordinator
University of Arizona Library Special Collections
520.621.4300

"To live is to fly
 low and high
 so shake the dust off of your wings
 and the sleep out of your eyes"
               -Townes van Zandt

"The opinions or statements expressed herein are my own and should not be
taken as a position, opinion,or endorsement of the University of Arizona."

-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Lacy [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 12:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Date normalization for B.C.?

All,
Is it possible to normalize pre-Christian era dates using ISO
8601? I've got a series consisting of artifacts ca. 6th century-1st
century B.C. The standard
(http://xml.coverpages.org/ISO-FDIS-8601.pdf) is designed
for use with the Gregorian calendar, and cautions about its use for dates
preceding 1582.

Any advice on encoding my <unitdate> would be appreciated!

Mary Lacy
Manuscript Division, Library of Congress
(202)707-8799 fax (202)707-6336
[log in to unmask]
**usual disclaimers apply**