Print

Print


I've not used it but, lacking this feature, refused to consider it.  And, I
feel, the groove wall balancing task is better accomplished in the analog
domain.

For vertical records which are not precisely vertical, the same option is
also essential.  A hard-wired vertical cartridge is a poor second.

It's a design flaw, plain and simple.

Steven Smolian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Parker Dinkins" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] 78 rpm transfer equipment


> Well, I think the Elberg is intended for use by professionals who want 1)
> balanced stereo outputs, 2) dual phono inputs with excellent s/n ratios,
and
> 3) precise eq.
>
> I've had other phono preamps, and for pro use, nothing else comes close to
> the Elberg.
>
> To me, the issues you cite as flaws are fairly trivial, and include
routine
> tasks that I feel are far better done in the digital domain - after the
> initial transfer.
>
> With our workflow, the Elberg is a stellar performer. I give it the
highest
> marks.
>
> Parker Dinkins
>
>
>
>
> on 6/29/04 7:58 PM US/Central, Steven Smolian at [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> > The last I looked, this was a flawed product- no vertical, no nulling,
no
> > laft-right channel option.  This is essential, not an option, when
dubbing
> > old records.  Perhaps I misremembered- it won't download- another
internet
> > crisis, I guess.
> >
> > Steve Smolian
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dale Francis" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 4:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] 78 rpm transfer equipment
> >
> >> try this link
> >> < http://www.vadlyd.dk/English/RIAA_and_78_RPM_preamp.html >
> >>
> >> Dale
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >> www.longrunaudio.com
>
> ---
> Parker Dinkins
> MasterDigital Corporation
> CD Mastering + Audio Restoration
> http://masterdigital.com
>