 |
 |
> I suppose I should just join the SRW mailing list if I do > much more of > this :-) Please do - only one other person (apart from myself) tested the current draft schema after I made the (somewhat major) change from all groups to sequence groups - and he reported that the schema was fine - as did the testing tools I was using (which included a WS-I Compliance testing tool). I was just about to get Ray to update the live schemas and was writing up the changes when I spotted the duplication problem and hence have delayed sending Ray the new ones until I can do a more thorough review in case there was something else wrong. Having some others on the list to validate the schema using other tools would be very usefull! Matthew