 |
 |
I don't know where we left off on this discussion. It sounds much like the discussion we had (15 years ago) when 'brief' and 'full' indicators were suggested for Z39.50, and that discussion resulted in the element set name parameter. What's different now that would justify a 'brief' indicator? Then, moving on a number of years to the most recent ZIG meeting (April 2002) we firmly decided in the ZIG that element set names (in the XML world) were tantamount to schema names. So yes, we would have a MarcXML and BriefMarcXML, Brief1MarcXML, etc. What's changed since 2002? --Ray ----- Original Message ----- From: "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 9:37 AM Subject: Re: Betr.: Re: brief and full records So I have multiple schemas available. One is MarcXML and the other is BriefMarcXML. Can't we agree on some mechanism to indicate that the one is a variant on the other with fewer elements? I think a place to put the URI of the full schema and a simple briefness indicator would be sufficient. Ralph