> That sounds like a really bad idea: work for a human to do in > maintaining it, and _then_ a computer can't use it. I don't think it will be much work to maintain. > It looks to me like the actual requirement is > handily met with a brief/full bit. Ain't that so? Ok back to my question of a week or so ago. Our experience with Z39.50 convinced us that the brief/full distinction was inadequate. What's changed? --Ray