> -----Original Message----- > From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Mike Taylor > Matthew J. Dovey wrote: > > If we are going to introduce SRU POST, I think I would suggest we do > > this (although I would anticipate SRU GET and POST being always on the > > same endpoint). It is backwards compatible with the current situation in > > that all of these endpoints could be the same (if you want to do clever > > inspection of the incoming data to workout how to handle it), but would > > allow multiple endpoints for those who might regard having to do this > > inspection as an unexceptable overhead. > > Agree 100%. My reference to what our own implementation was meant only > to be a proof-by-existence of the feasibility of that approach -- not a > demand that everyone else implement the same approach. Well, let me jump on this bandwagon too! I'm 110% behind it! Ralph