On Jan 26, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:

> It's time for some separate sub-threads, I think.

Yes.  Thanks!

> From: "Bruce D'Arcus" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Why should MODS and MADS be in separate namespaces to begin with?
> Again let me reiterate this example I gave yesterday:  mods and mads
> <name>
> are defined differently, so in the  single-namespace approach you'd
> need
> different names for 'name' e.g.  <modsName> and <madsName>.

But again, this is confusing namespace and definition; isn't it?
Regardless of how you do the namespaces, the definitions will need
different names if they are different.  Except ...

... in RNG, you can have a base definition in your library, and then
redefine it on import.   You can see a MODS-related example here, where
I include mods in docbook, but redefine the mods extension element to
allow docbook content (for editing support):

Can you not do that in XSD?