 |
 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress > > So we could call it: > > x-info-1-acceptAny > > However we could instead call it: > > x-info-1-accept > > where there is a value, i.e. 'any', thus the parameter: > 'x-info-1-accept=any'. > > This would leave room to later define other values, subclasses, > which could be profiled. Would this be preferable (and if so > I would change the name of the info uri from > 'info:srw/extension/1/will-accept-any-extra-data' to > 'info:srw/extension/1/accept'). Ick. If the SRU parameter is supposed to map to a URI, then what does the structure URI=value mean? Stick to x-info-1-acceptAny Ralph